With regards to siding with Didascalo or Protopiro, I would side with Didascalo. I believe […]
Category: Week 6 Responses
Week 6 Response
Despite Protopiro important contributions, I would have to agree with Didascolo. His design philosophy remembered […]
Week 6 Response
I would side with Didascolo over Protopiro. His ideas were based upon the Vitruvian style […]
Week 6 Response
Between Didascalo and Protopiro, I would side with Didascalo. I agree with some of Protopiro’s […]
Week 6
I personally am on the side of Didascolo. While Protopiro has some valid points to […]
Week 6 response
In my opinion, I would have to side with Didascolo over Protopiro. While I do […]
Week 6 Response
Between the two, I would side with Didascalo. While I would agree with Protopiro’s assessment […]
Week 6 Response
I side with Didascolo. He believed that the ornamentation aspect of architecture is what makes […]
Week 6 Response
I side with Didascalo. I agreed that ornamentation and creativity is better than strictly following […]
Week 6 Response
I side with Didascolo because I believe form can transcend Protopiro’s argument that architecture is […]
Week 6 Response
Personally, I think I side with Didascolo and his argument over Protopiro. Didascolo supports ornamentation […]
Week 6
Personally, I would choose to side with Didascalo over Protopiro. This is because he argues for eclecticism and decoration to distinguish […]
Week 6 response
Personally, I would side with Didascalo. Architecture is definitely a science and form of mathematics, […]
Although I think that Protopiro’s argument is very good I think that I would side […]
Week 6 Response
I will take the side of Didascalo’s argument, because I agree that architects should have […]
Week 6 – Didascalo vs Protopiro
Picking a side in Piranesi’s Parere su l’architettura is inherently flawed due to the strong […]
Week 6 Response
I would side with Didascalo because I think we are at a phase of emphasizing […]
Week 6 Response
I would side more with Didascalo simply because Protopiro was too constricting in his ideas […]
Week 6 Response
I am having a tough time deciding on who to support because I like parts […]
Week 6 Response
I would side with Didascolo, and his argument that ornamentation is necessary to a degree […]
Week 6 Response
I personally would side with Didascolo over Protopiro. The reason I like Didascolo better is […]
Week 6 Response
I would side with Didascalo because I believe that ornamentation allows for freedom and an […]
Week 6 Response
I would choose to side with Didascalo. Although he believed in a more ornamented style, […]
Week 6 Response
I think I will stand with Protopiro which is buildings rely too much on ornamentation. […]
Week 6 Response
I would have to side with Didascolo over Protopiro. While I understand Protopiro’s view on […]
Week 6 Response
I would side with Protopiro due to the fact that Didascalo is basically trying to […]
Week 6 Response
Didascalo’s opinion was a mirror of Piranesi’s. Didascalo said that ornamentation is important in a […]
Week 6 Response
I seem to agree more with Protopiro’s philosophy than Didoscalo’s, on the grounds that I […]
Week 6 Response
Personally I side with Didascalo because I believe architects are artists and the buildings they’re […]
Week6 Response
Personally, I would choose to agree with Didascalo, who proposed to discard Vitruvian principles of […]